From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hafezi v. Remington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2019
Case No. CV 16-3374-JAK (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-3374-JAK (DFM)

10-31-2019

FARHAD FRED HAFEZI, Petitioner, v. CALVIN REMINGTON, Respondent.


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Respondent did not file objections. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Petition ("FAP") is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent file an answer to the FAP within thirty-five (35) days of this order. Petitioner may file a reply within twenty-one (21) days of service of Respondent's Answer. Date: October 31, 2019

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hafezi v. Remington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2019
Case No. CV 16-3374-JAK (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)
Case details for

Hafezi v. Remington

Case Details

Full title:FARHAD FRED HAFEZI, Petitioner, v. CALVIN REMINGTON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 16-3374-JAK (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2019)