From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haendel v. Reed

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 26, 2019
No. 18-7216 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7216

03-26-2019

DAN HAENDEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANNA REED, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney City of Staunton; BB CULLY, Police Officer, City of Staunton; RAYMOND C. ROBERTSON, Commonwealth Attorney, City of Staunton; JIM WILLIAMS, Chief of Police, City of Staunton; MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General Commonwealth of Virginia; HOWARD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees.

Dan Haendel, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-00119-JLK-RSB) Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dan Haendel, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dan Haendel appeals the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haendel v. Reed, No. 7:17-cv-00119-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2018; Sept. 10, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Haendel v. Reed

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 26, 2019
No. 18-7216 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Haendel v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:DAN HAENDEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANNA REED, Assistant Commonwealth…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7216 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 2019)