From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 30, 2007
732 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 2007)

Opinion

No. A07-258.

May 30, 2007.

Gary L. Meyer, Meyer, Puklich, Merriam Johnson, Eden Prairie, MN, for Respondent.

Kris A Wittwer, Stewart, Zlimen Jungers, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Relator/Respondent.

Roderick C. Cosgriff, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff, Johnson, P.A., Saint Paul, MN, for Intervenors.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Sam Hanson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 30, 2007
732 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 2007)
Case details for

Haeg v. Seko Worldwide

Case Details

Full title:Tamara Joan HAEG, Respondent, v. SEKO WORLDWIDE d/b/a Vast Logistics…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

732 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bruton v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.

See, e.g. , Johnson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minn. , 329 N.W.2d 49, 52 (Minn. 1983) (explaining that…