From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hadrigan v. Metalios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 4, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In the instant action, the plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, in their complaint, and in their motion for summary judgment, that the defendant Theodore Metalios, a licensed real estate broker whom they retained to sell their home had, in several instances, breached his fiduciary duty to deal honestly and fairly with them. However, the opposing affidavit submitted by the defendant Metalios, and the documentary evidence in the record indicate, inter alia, that he had advised plaintiffs that he was acting as a "disclosed principal" and was also owed a commission. In view of the contradictory affidavits submitted by the parties, Special Term properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (see, Andre v. Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hadrigan v. Metalios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1987
130 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Hadrigan v. Metalios

Case Details

Full title:WALTER HADRIGAN et al., Appellants, v. THEODORE METALIOS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)