From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hadley v. Massachusetts

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 464 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 1179, Misc.

Decided June 12, 1967.

351 Mass. 439, 222 N.E.2d 681, vacated and remanded.

Louis M. Nordlinger for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Willie J. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CLARK'S dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S., at 546.


Summaries of

Hadley v. Massachusetts

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 464 (1967)
Case details for

Hadley v. Massachusetts

Case Details

Full title:HADLEY v . MASSACHUSETTS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 464 (1967)

Citing Cases

Young v. Patukonis

The primary purpose of the sanitary code is to protect the public and prevent violations rather than to…

Decoulos v. Peabody

See also G.L.c. 83, §§ 3 and 11. We assume (without deciding) that the city could not in its zoning ordinance…