From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haddock v. Doe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 9, 2024
LA CV 23-09058-VBF-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2024)

Opinion

LA CV 23-09058-VBF-KES

09-09-2024

DONNELL G. HADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JANE DOE OF WEST COVINA CITRUS COURT, Defendant.


ORDER

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dismissing Case Without Prejudice

By Order issued March 30, 2024 (CM/ECF System Document (“Doc”) 9), the Magistrate Judge dismissed the complaint without prejudice and advised plaintiff that he could file a First Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by June 28, 2024.

The May 30, 2024 Order (Doc 9) was returned to the Court as undeliverable on June 20, 2024 (Doc 10).

By Order issued July 5, 2024 (Doc 11), the Magistrate Judge sua sponte extended plaintiff's deadline to respond to the dismissal order to August 5,2024, warning plaintiff that this action “may be dismissed for lack of prosecution” if he filed to timely respond.

The extended deadline of August 5, 2024 elapsed over one month ago, and the Court has received no further filings from the plaintiff.

The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Haddock v. Doe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 9, 2024
LA CV 23-09058-VBF-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Haddock v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:DONNELL G. HADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JANE DOE OF WEST COVINA CITRUS…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2024

Citations

LA CV 23-09058-VBF-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2024)