From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HADDOCK v. CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQ

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 6, 2006
No. 02-06-096-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 6, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-06-096-CV

Delivered: April 6, 2006.

Appeal from the 17th District Court of Tarrant County.

Panel D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and McCOY, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


We have considered "Appellant's Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of this appeal shall be taxed against the party incurring same, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

HADDOCK v. CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQ

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Apr 6, 2006
No. 02-06-096-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 6, 2006)
Case details for

HADDOCK v. CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQ

Case Details

Full title:GERALD W. HADDOCK, Appellant, v. CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 6, 2006

Citations

No. 02-06-096-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Haddock v. Quinn

After a two-day hearing, the trial court signed a final judgment on December 1, 2005, ordering that Haddock…