From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hadden v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 14, 1955
90 S.E.2d 405 (Ga. 1955)

Opinion

19123.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 10, 1955.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 14, 1955.

Mandamus. Before Judge Stephens. Laurens Superior Court. July 7, 1955.

W. W. Larsen, Jr., Harold E. Ward, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. Malcolm Towson, contra.


Any citizen has such interest in having public officers perform their duties as will authorize him to maintain mandamus proceedings for that purpose. Code § 64-101. In such action, although the official duty required is that of issuing a building permit, it is not a private right of the petitioner requiring a showing of irreparable injury as required by Code § 64-105. A filling station is not a nuisance per se; and it appearing from all the evidence in this record that the only evidence offered in opposition to the application for the permit was of property owners nearby upon grounds of danger, noise and the depressing of the value of their property, none of which amount to a valid reason for declining the permit, it was therefore an abuse of discretion to refuse the mandamus. City of Pearson v. Glidden Co., 205 Ga. 738 ( 55 S.E.2d 125); City of Hawkinsville v. Williams, 185 Ga. 396 ( 195 S.E. 162); Wofford Oil Co. v. City of Calhoun, 183 Ga. 511 ( 189 S.E. 5); Brown v. City of Thomasville, 156 Ga. 260 ( 118 S.E. 854).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 10, 1955 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 14, 1955.


Summaries of

Hadden v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 14, 1955
90 S.E.2d 405 (Ga. 1955)
Case details for

Hadden v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:HADDEN v. PIERCE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 14, 1955

Citations

90 S.E.2d 405 (Ga. 1955)
90 S.E.2d 405

Citing Cases

Pierce, v. Cullens

Since the evidence shows that the petitioner, who is seeking the writ of mandamus to require the city…

Moore v. Mayor c. of Statesboro

The evidence shows without dispute that water and sewerage are available to the plaintiff's property without…