From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haddad v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 10, 2013
No. 61281 (Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61281

04-10-2013

RICHARD S. HADDAD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Doug Smith, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

Appellant stated in his April 23, 2012, petition that he had expired his sentence and was no longer in custody when he filed the petition in the district court. A post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus is not available to petitioners who have completed the sentence imposed by the judgment of conviction and are no longer in custody. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6(1); NRS 34.724(1); Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999). Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err in denying the petition. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

_______________, J.

Hardesty

_______________, J.

Parraguirre

_______________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge

Richard S. Haddad

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Haddad v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 10, 2013
No. 61281 (Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Haddad v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD S. HADDAD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

No. 61281 (Nev. Apr. 10, 2013)