Opinion
February 2, 1950.
J.H. Lewis J.M. Haddad, for the petitioner.
F.E. Kelly, Attorney General, E.J. Nantoski, Assistant Attorney General, J.A. Brennan, for the defendant.
Decision of District Court dismissing the petition affirmed. The testimony of the claimant at a hearing upon his first application for unemployment benefits that he would not accept employment paying only $25 a week was competent evidence in the present proceedings which are based upon a second application for benefits. The ground of the instant appeal and the only contention of the claimant is that there was error of law in the decision denying his second application for benefits because that decision resulted from incorporating the evidence adduced at the previous hearing into the hearing given upon his second application. Such a contention is not supported by anything appearing in the record and consequently cannot be sustained.
The case was submitted on briefs.