From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hackensack Water Co. v. Utility Com

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 17, 1924
100 N.J.L. 177 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Argued March 6, 1924 —

Decided April 17, 1924.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J.L. 41.

For the respondent, Collins Corbin and Thomas Brown.

For the appellant, William S. Stuhr, Jr.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hackensack Water Co. v. Utility Com

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 17, 1924
100 N.J.L. 177 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Hackensack Water Co. v. Utility Com

Case Details

Full title:HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 17, 1924

Citations

100 N.J.L. 177 (N.J. 1924)
124 A. 925

Citing Cases

In re N.J. Power Light Co.

II. THE DOCTRINE OF THE HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY CASE The company rests its case primarily on Hackensack…

Utilities Comm. v. Edmisten, Atty. General

Los Angeles Gas Electric Corp. v. Railroad Commission of California, 289 U.S. 287, 313, 53 S.Ct. 637, 77…