Opinion
2:22-cv-02012-GMN-BNW
12-29-2022
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. Charles E. Gianelloni Attorneys for Plaintiff Benn Godenzi WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP Bradley S. Schrager Attorneys for Patrick Hable
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. Charles E. Gianelloni Attorneys for Plaintiff Benn Godenzi
WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP Bradley S. Schrager Attorneys for Patrick Hable
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT BENN GODENZI TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(A) and L.R. IA 6-1, Benn Godenzi (“Defendant”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and Patrick Hable (“Defendant”, and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint until January 30, 2023.
The Parties seek this extension in good faith and not for the purposes of undue delay, and to allow Defendant to retain counsel and evaluate the claims. The procedural posture of this case is as follows:
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2022, Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a Complaint against the Defendant;
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2022, a Summons was issued to the Defendant;
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2022, Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint;
WHEREAS, based on the date of service above, the current deadline for the Defendant to answer the Complaint is December 30, 2022.
WHEREAS, the Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline for the Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 30, 2023.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing and subject to Court approval, the Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the deadline for the Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be January 30, 2023.
ORDER
The Court having considered the foregoing joint motion by the Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant shall have until January 30, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.