Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield Cnty., Inc. v. Lanham

Full title: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY, INC. v. Kim LANHAM et al.

Court: Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

166 Conn. App. 399 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016)

141 A.3d 937

Opinion

No. 37940.

06-21-2016

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY, INC. v. Kim LANHAM et al.

Kim Lanham, self-represented, the appellant (named defendant). Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, was Vincent M. Marino, Middletown, for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

Kim Lanham, self-represented, the appellant (named defendant).

Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, was Vincent M. Marino, Middletown, for the appellee (plaintiff).

ALVORD, PRESCOTT and MULLINS, Js.

Opinion PER CURIAM. The defendant Kim Lanham appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court, in favor of the plaintiff, Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield County, Inc. After reviewing and considering the record in this case, including the briefs and arguments of the parties on appeal, we conclude that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure. There is no error.

The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of setting new law days.