From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Habeck v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Mar 19, 2018
ACTION NO. 2:17cv256 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2018)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 2:17cv256

03-19-2018

HAROLD A. HABECK, II, #80545-083, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

This matter was initiated by petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Petitioner Harold A. Habeck, II, is a federal prisoner convicted in the Eastern District of Virginia, who is seeking resentencing pursuant to the United States Supreme Court case, Dean v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1170 (2017). Id. Habeck argues that the "savings clause" in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 allows him to seek relief pursuant to section 2241 because the one-year time limit for filing for relief pursuant to section 2255 has expired and he will otherwise be unable to obtain relief. Id. at 1-2; see 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) (noting that "[a] 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section").

The petition was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. In the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed February 8, 2018, the Court found that the "savings clause" in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) does not apply to Habeck's petition, and the Court lacks jurisdiction over the section 2241 petition. ECF No. 11. The report recommends that Habeck's petition for a writ of habeas corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice.

Habeck filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on February 23, 2018, and filed a signed version of the objections on February 28, 2018. ECF Nos. 12, 13. The Court, having reviewed the record and examined the objections filed by Habeck to the Report and Recommendation, and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice.

Habeck may appeal from the Judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a notice of appeal with the Clerk of this Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within sixty days from the date of entry of such Judgment.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Habeck and to counsel of record for Respondent.

/s/ _________

Arenda L. Wright Allen

United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia
March 19th, 2018


Summaries of

Habeck v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Mar 19, 2018
ACTION NO. 2:17cv256 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2018)
Case details for

Habeck v. United States

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD A. HABECK, II, #80545-083, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

ACTION NO. 2:17cv256 (E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2018)

Citing Cases

Baza v. United States

Although the instant motion was filed within one year of the decision in Dean v. United States, "other courts…