From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Habda v. Wysocker

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 1, 1972
458 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1428.

Submitted April 7, 1972.

Decided May 1, 1972.

Laszlo Habda, in pro. per.

Ralph De Sevo, De Sevo, Cerutti, Lombadi Fitzpatrick, Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Before HASTIE and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges, and BECKER, District Judge.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Appellant's civil action for damages against his former attorney alleges that the attorney in a criminal case in a state court neglected to challenge the legal sufficiency of an indictment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that there was no federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1343. On the authority of Thomas v. Howard, 455 F.2d 228 (3d Cir., filed Feb. 9, 1972), we affirm.


Summaries of

Habda v. Wysocker

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 1, 1972
458 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Habda v. Wysocker

Case Details

Full title:LASZLO HABDA, APPELLANT, v. JACK WYSOCKER, ESQ

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 1, 1972

Citations

458 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Com. v. Carsia

We refuse to subscribe to the Commonwealth's argument. Although there is no specific authority on this point,…

Brown v. Joseph

It is settled in this circuit that a private attorney is not a state officer so as to bring his actions…