From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haas v. Yousef

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Sep 26, 2018
255 So. 3d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 3D18-1779

09-26-2018

Karen J. HAAS, Petitioner, v. Suleiman Habib YOUSEF, Respondent.

Karen J. Haas, in proper person. Nayib Hassan, for respondent.


Karen J. Haas, in proper person.

Nayib Hassan, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Karen Haas seeks an Emergency Writ of Prohibition to review the denial of her motion to disqualify the trial judge below. Because Ms. Haas's allegation of ex parte communication forms a prima facie basis for disqualification, we ordered a response. See Brake v. Murphy, 693 So.2d 663, 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) ("We find one point determinative, that being petitioners' argument that when confronted with record evidence of ex parte communication, the trial judge should have granted petitioners' motion for disqualification."). No response was filed. We therefore grant the Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition, direct the disqualification of the trial judge, and remand the case for further proceedings. See Daugherty v. McNeal, 643 So.2d 665 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (granting a petition for writ of prohibition after no response was filed); State ex rel. Ginsberg v. Wiseheart, 120 So.2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960) (holding that where no response is filed, the only question is whether the petition for writ of prohibition states a prima facie case). Although we grant the Petition, we assume it will not be necessary to issue a formal writ.


Summaries of

Haas v. Yousef

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Sep 26, 2018
255 So. 3d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Haas v. Yousef

Case Details

Full title:Karen J. Haas, Petitioner, v. Suleiman Habib Yousef, Respondent.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Sep 26, 2018

Citations

255 So. 3d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)