From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haas v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 9, 1992
416 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. 1992)

Opinion

S92A0218.

DECIDED APRIL 9, 1992.

Murder. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Smith.

Moore Dodgen, Andrew C. Dodgen, Robert L. Wadkins, for appellant.

Douglas C. Pullen, District Attorney, J. Gray Conger, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Staff Attorney, for appellee.


Michael Haas killed Phyllis Godwin by striking her on the head with a blunt object. He was convicted of malice murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment.

The homicide occurred on August 28, 1989. Haas was indicted on August 21, 1990. He was found guilty on May 2, 1991, and was sentenced the same date. A notice of appeal was filed on May 30, 1991. The appeal was docketed on November 14, 1991. Oral arguments were heard on January 22, 1992.

1. We have reviewed Haas' claims of error. We hold that the evidence is sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.C. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979); and there was no error in the trial of the case that warrants a new trial, or other substantial relief.

2. Haas claims ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time on appeal, through appellate counsel who was appointed after the filing of the notice of appeal. The case is remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the claim of ineffective assistance under Johnson v. State, 259 Ga. 428 ( 383 S.E.2d 115) (1989).

Judgment affirmed and case remanded for hearing. All the Justices concur; Sears-Collins, J., not participating.


DECIDED APRIL 9, 1992.


Summaries of

Haas v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 9, 1992
416 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. 1992)
Case details for

Haas v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAAS v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 9, 1992

Citations

416 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. 1992)
416 S.E.2d 88

Citing Cases

Russell v. State

4. Russell raises the ineffective assistance of trial counsel for the first time in this appeal, through his…

Meriwether v. State

]" In this case counsel did not pursue a motion for new trial after the grant of the out-of-time appeal and…