From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAAS v. REESE

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 27, 1940
196 So. 564 (La. 1940)

Opinion

No. 35725.

April 29, 1940. Rehearing Denied May 27, 1940.

Appeal from Twelfth Judicial District Court, Parish of Avoyelles; C.R. Bordelon, Judge.

Suit by W.D. Haas, Jr., against Maude Bernard Reese and others to set aside a judgment rendered in proceedings partitioning property by licitation. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Judgment annulled and set aside, and suit directed to be dismissed.

Gordon B. Hyde and John T. Charbonnet, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Couvillon Couvillon and Joffrion Bordelon, all of Marksville, and McCoy King, of Lake Charles, for appellee.


This is a companion suit to the case of Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese et al., 195 La. 359, 196 So. 558, and the opinion in that case disposes of the issues raised here.

The fact that the plaintiff in this case acquired royalty deeds from seven of the co-owners, in addition to mineral leases from three of them, without the consent or concurrence of the other co-owners, does not make any difference in the result, for the reason, as explained in the Amerada case, that where property is held in indivision between several co-owners, none can confer rights on the entirety of the common property without the consent of all the others.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is annulled and set aside, and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff's suit is dismissed at his cost.

O'NIELL, C.J., does not take part.


Summaries of

HAAS v. REESE

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 27, 1940
196 So. 564 (La. 1940)
Case details for

HAAS v. REESE

Case Details

Full title:HAAS v. REESE ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 27, 1940

Citations

196 So. 564 (La. 1940)
196 So. 564

Citing Cases

Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese

The cases, for purposes of trial, were consolidated. The record further reveals that of the twenty-three…