Opinion
March, 1914.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P.J., who dissented; Foote, J., not sitting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
HAAK v. BUFFALO, ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH RAIL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1914
162 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Summaries of
HAAK v. BUFFALO, ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH RAIL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1914
162 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for
HAAK v. BUFFALO, ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURGH RAIL
Case Details
Full title:Susan Haak, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1914
Citations
162 App. Div. 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)