From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haag v. MaComber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 16, 2024
24-cv-05111-SB (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-05111-SB

08-16-2024

JAMES BRADLEY HAAG, Plaintiff, v. JEFF MACOMBER et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge

Plaintiff James Bradley Haag, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on June 7, 2024, without paying the required filing fee or submitting a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. No. 1. On June 17, 2024, the clerk's office notified Plaintiff of the deficiency, provided an IFP form application (CV-60P), directed Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit an IFP request within 30 days, and noted that failure to do so within 30 days may result in dismissal. Dkt. No. 5. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not paid the fee or filed an IFP request. By no later than September 5, 2024, Plaintiff is ordered to either pay the filing fee or file form CV-60P requesting to proceed IFP. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice.


Summaries of

Haag v. MaComber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 16, 2024
24-cv-05111-SB (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Haag v. MaComber

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BRADLEY HAAG, Plaintiff, v. JEFF MACOMBER et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 16, 2024

Citations

24-cv-05111-SB (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024)