Haag v. City of Syracuse

Full title: STEVE HAAG, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE and DET. MICHAEL MUSENGO, in…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

5:10-cv-77 (NPM/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

5:10-cv-77 (NPM/ATB)

11-28-2011

STEVE HAAG, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SYRACUSE and DET. MICHAEL MUSENGO, in his Individual Capacity Defendants.

Mary Anne Doherty, Corporation Counsel Attorney for Defendants James P. McGinty Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel Bar Roll No. 601102 Office of the Corporation Counsel Brian P. Barrett, Esq Attorney for Plaintiff Bar Roll No. 514001 72 Olympic Drive

Andrew T. Baxter

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, being that no party hereto is an infant or incompetent, by and among the undersigned counsel for all parties that, the Plaintiff's action is dismissed against Defendant City of Syracuse, with prejudice and without costs to any party.

Mary Anne Doherty,

Corporation Counsel

Attorney for Defendants

James P. McGinty

Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel

Bar Roll No. 601102

Office of the Corporation Counsel

Brian P. Barrett, Esq

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bar Roll No. 514001

72 Olympic Drive

SO ORDERED

Hon. Andrew T. Baxter,

Magistrate Judge