From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H-W Tech., L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-0651-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-0651-G

06-20-2013

H-W TECHNOLOGY, L.C., Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation, the defendants' renewed motion to dismiss under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), filed September 7, 2012 (docket entry 391) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

_______________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

H-W Tech., L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jun 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-0651-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 20, 2013)
Case details for

H-W Tech., L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:H-W TECHNOLOGY, L.C., Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 20, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-CV-0651-G (N.D. Tex. Jun. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

In re Taasera Licensing, Patent Litig.

Indeed, many courts have determined that construing claims at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage is inappropriate,…