From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H-W Tech., Inc. v. Overstock.Com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0636-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0636-G (BH)

09-03-2014

H-W TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. OVERSTOCK.COM, INC., Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant's motion for exceptional case finding and award of attorneys' fees and expenses, filed November 1, 2013 (docket entry 73) is DENIED. September 3, 2014.

/s/_________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

H-W Tech., Inc. v. Overstock.Com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0636-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2014)
Case details for

H-W Tech., Inc. v. Overstock.Com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:H-W TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. OVERSTOCK.COM, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 3, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-0636-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Sep. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Vedanti Licensing Ltd., LLC v. Google LLC

In sum, Vedanti “may have asserted a losing argument, but this does not amount to the type of extraordinary…

Nursery Decals & More Inc. v. Neat Print Inc.

But the fact that Neat Print lost its case, even on summary judgment, does not necessarily make the case…