From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H. W. Ragland v. O. Austin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
May 19, 1926
284 S.W. 330 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)

Opinion

Nos. 1343, 1345-1347, 1349, and 1350.

April 9, 1926. Rehearing Denied May 19, 1926.

Appeal from District Court, Angelina County; C. A. Hodges, Judge.

Mantooth Denman, of Lufkin, for appellants.

Fairchild Redditt, of Lufkin, for appellee.


The above cases are companion cases to Markus v. Austin, 284 S.W. 326. The facts are the same and questions of law identical. What we have said in Markus v. Austin disposes of the issues raised in each of these cases, and, for the reasons there stated, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.


Summaries of

H. W. Ragland v. O. Austin

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont
May 19, 1926
284 S.W. 330 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)
Case details for

H. W. Ragland v. O. Austin

Case Details

Full title:H. W. RAGLAND v. Chas. O. AUSTIN, Commissioner of Banking. W. R. FULLER v…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont

Date published: May 19, 1926

Citations

284 S.W. 330 (Tex. Civ. App. 1926)

Citing Cases

Baird v. Eidsvig

Burnaman v. Peterson, 117 Kan. 612, 232 P. 1047. "Creditors entitled to the benefit of double liability are…