From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gypsum Res. v. Clark Cnty.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:19-cv-00850-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00850-GMN-EJY

02-15-2023

GYPSUM RESOURCES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendants.

James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027 Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534 Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695 Jordan T. Smith, Esq., Bar No. 12097 Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., Bar No. 13442 PISANELLI BICE PLLC Counsel for Plaintiff Gypsum Resources, LLC OLSON CANON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI Thomas D. Dillard, Jr. Esq. DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY Robert T. Warhola, Esq., Attorneys for Defendants


James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027

Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534

Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695

Jordan T. Smith, Esq., Bar No. 12097

Emily A. Buchwald, Esq., Bar No. 13442

PISANELLI BICE PLLC

Counsel for Plaintiff Gypsum Resources, LLC

OLSON CANON GORMLEY & STOBERSKI

Thomas D. Dillard, Jr. Esq.

DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Robert T. Warhola, Esq.,

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

Plaintiff Gypsum Resources, LLC ("Gypsum"), and Defendants Clark County and Clark County Board of Commissioners (collectively "Clark County"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On January 18, 2023, Gypsum filed a Motion for Sanctions Against Defendants ("Motion for Sanctions"). [ECF No. 90.]

2. On January 26, 2023, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Opposition to Gypsum's Motion for Sanctions. [ECF No. 99.] On February 10, 2023, Clark County filed its Opposition to Motion for Sanctions. [ECF No. 102.]

3. On February 14, 2023, counsel for Gypsum contacted counsel for Clark County requesting an extension of time, from February 17, 2023, to February 24, 2023, to file Gypsum's reply brief to the Motion for Sanction, to which counsel for Clark County agreed.

4. Therefore, Gypsum shall have until February 24, 2023, to file its reply brief to the Motion for Sanctions.

Prepared and Respectfully Submitted by:

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gypsum Res. v. Clark Cnty.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
2:19-cv-00850-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Gypsum Res. v. Clark Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:GYPSUM RESOURCES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-00850-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)