From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gwinn v. Washington Post Co.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 18, 1954
211 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11923.

Argued February 9, 1954.

Decided February 18, 1954.

Mr. Stanley E. Otto, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Mr. Gerhard A. Gesell, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Fontaine C. Bradley and Abram J. Chayes, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.


This is a suit for libel. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant newspaper. It appears that on a certain day police officers and federal agents set out to execute some thirty-six warrants of arrest. Five persons sought under the warrants were found upon the premises of a restaurant and nightclub owned by the appellants, and the arrests were made there. The arrested persons were taken promptly to the United States Commissioner and held by him under bonds. The Washington Post carried a factual news story of the events. The story, fairly read, contains nothing defamatory of the appellants or of their business. There is evidence in the record that appellants cooperated in the law enforcement move. The judgment of the District Court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gwinn v. Washington Post Co.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 18, 1954
211 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Gwinn v. Washington Post Co.

Case Details

Full title:GWINN et al. v. WASHINGTON POST CO

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 1954

Citations

211 F.2d 641 (D.C. Cir. 1954)

Citing Cases

Fairyland Amusement Co. v. Metromedia, Inc.

A mere report of immoral or illegal activities "in and around" the premises cannot be fairly interpreted to…

Embers Supper Club v. Scripps-Howard

The law generally applied in this regard is that a report or commentary of illegal activity at a place of…