Opinion
CV-22-08140-PCT-JAT
04-22-2024
Gerald Vaughn Gwen, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
James A. Teilborg, Senior United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Objections to Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). (Doc. 62). The Court now rules.
Petitioner states that he has not been served the substantive aspect of the R&R and thus would be prejudiced if he is expected to lodge his objections to its contents without a copy of the ninety-one-page document. (Doc. 62 at 2). The Court agrees. If petitioner has not received the substantive aspect of the R&R due to an administrative error, he cannot adequately object.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Objections to R&R, (Doc. 62), is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the ninety-one (91) page R&R to lodge any objections he may have.