From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Taft Plaza, LTD

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Feb 4, 2010
CASE NO. 09-61483-CIV-O'SULLIVAN [CONSENT] (S.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09-61483-CIV-O'SULLIVAN [CONSENT].

February 4, 2010


ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE


THIS MATTER came before the Court sua sponte following notice from the parties that the case has settled and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement.

THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

This case involves a claim for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a bona fide dispute over the number of hours worked by the plaintiff. The Court has reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiff and the attorney's fees and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' Settlement Agreement (including attorney's fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court retains jurisdiction until Friday, March 5, 2010 to enforce the terms of the settlement

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Taft Plaza, LTD

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Feb 4, 2010
CASE NO. 09-61483-CIV-O'SULLIVAN [CONSENT] (S.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Guzman v. Taft Plaza, LTD

Case Details

Full title:MARCELINO GUZMAN, Plaintiff, v. TAFT PLAZA, LTD and DAVID GABLE, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 09-61483-CIV-O'SULLIVAN [CONSENT] (S.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2010)