Opinion
Civil Action 1:21-cv-00192
09-28-2022
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROLANDO OLVERA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court are these pleadings: Defendant's "Motion for Summary Judgment" ("MSJ") (Dkt. No. 9), Plaintiff's "Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("Response") (Dkt. No. 13), Defendant's "Amended Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("First Amended Reply") (Dkt. No. 18), Plaintiff's "Surreply in Support of Denial of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment" ("Surreply") (Dkt. No. 24) and the "Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 45). The R&R recommends this Court grant Defendant's MSJ (Dkt. No. 9).
No objections were filed by either party. When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's ruling,the district court applies the "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law" standard of review. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R is ADOPTED.
Defendant's MSJ (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED.