From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2015
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC)

05-04-2015

RAFAEL GUZMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A FURTHER RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS [ECF Nos. 29, 37, 41]

Plaintiff Rafael Guzman is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 17, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. No Objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on March 17, 2015, is adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies is DENIED; and

3. Defendants are directed to file a further response to the complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 4 , 2015

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Guzman v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2015
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Guzman v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL GUZMAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 4, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-cv-00828-LJO-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)