From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Hollingsworth

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Jun 2, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-245 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-245.

June 2, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Demetris Guzman, a federal prisoner previously confined in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Jordan Hollingsworth. Plaintiff alleges the defendant denied him due process by reducing his pay grade without giving plaintiff notice and an opportunity to be heard.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Because plaintiff does not have a liberty interest in his work assignment or pay grade, he was not entitled to any particular process before his pay grade was reduced. Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84 (1995).

After the report and recommendation was entered, plaintiff paid the full filing fee. Therefore, it is no longer appropriate to dismiss the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), which only applies to indigent litigants. However, dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which applies to all lawsuits filed by prisoners, regardless of whether the filing fee has been paid.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED to the extent that it recommends dismissing the case as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with this memorandum order.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Hollingsworth

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Jun 2, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-245 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Guzman v. Hollingsworth

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIS GUZMAN v. JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-245 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 2, 2006)