From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guzman v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 5, 2023
3:17-cv-00515-HDM-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)

Opinion

3:17-cv-00515-HDM-CLB

07-05-2023

MARCO GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

HOWARD D. McKIBBEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In this habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Marco Guzman, filed a reply to the respondents' answer on June 5, 2023 (ECF No. 92). On that date, Guzman also filed a motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 93) and a motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 94). The scheduling order (ECF No. 54) granted Respondents thirty days- until July 5, 2023-to file responses to Guzman's reply, motion for leave to conduct discovery and motion for evidentiary hearing.

On July 5, 2023, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 95), requesting a 75-day extension of time, to September 18, 2023. Respondents' counsel states that she needs this extension of time because the post-conviction division of the Attorney General's office “is currently understaffed, making [her] caseload extraordinarily heavy.” Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 95) at 3. Respondents' counsel represents that Guzman, who is represented by appointed counsel, does not oppose the motion for extension of time.

The Court finds that Respondents' motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested. The Court will grant this motion for extension of time.

However, given the nature of the filings at issue here, the length of this extension of time, and the time that the briefing of the merits of this habeas petition has taken- Respondents' motion to dismiss was resolved on February 24, 2022, and it took some ten months for Respondents to file their answer (ECF Nos. 74, 84)-the Court will not further extend this deadline. If Respondents do not file responses to Guzman's reply, motion for leave to conduct discovery and motion for evidentiary hearing by September 18, 2023, the Court will rule on Guzman's petition and motions without benefit of those responses.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 95) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including September 18, 2023, to file responses to Petitioner's reply, motion for leave to conduct discovery and motion for evidentiary hearing. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered January 19, 2021 (ECF No. 54) will remain in effect.


Summaries of

Guzman v. Gittere

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 5, 2023
3:17-cv-00515-HDM-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Guzman v. Gittere

Case Details

Full title:MARCO GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 5, 2023

Citations

3:17-cv-00515-HDM-CLB (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2023)