Opinion
2014-1421
01-09-2015
GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION, WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT) INC., WESTERN DIGITAL (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED, AND WESTERN DIGITAL (MALAYSIA) SDN.BHD., Defendants-Appellees.
A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Washington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San Francisco, CA.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:11-cv-03786-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.
JUDGMENT
A. MARISA CHUN, McDermott, Will & Emery, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were DANIEL E. ALBERTI and ERIC W. HAGEN. Of counsel were M. MILLER BAKER, of Washington, DC, and NATALIE A. BENNETT, of Chicago, Illinois DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Latham & Watkins, LLP, of Menlo Park, California argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RICHARD G. FRENKEL and MICHELLE P. WOODHOUSE; and JAMES L. DAY, of San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O'MALLEY, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 9, 2015
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court