From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guyton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 3, 2008
254 S.W.3d 894 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89605.

June 3, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Maleaner Ryna Harvey, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.



ORDER


Movant, Darius Guyton, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of his right to testify at trial.

The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Guyton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 3, 2008
254 S.W.3d 894 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Guyton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darius GUYTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 3, 2008

Citations

254 S.W.3d 894 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)