From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guyton v. Martin Finance Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 10, 1975
217 S.E.2d 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50636.

ARGUED MAY 6, 1975.

DECIDED JUNE 10, 1975.

Action on note. Fulton Civil Court. Before Judge Wright.

Richard K. Greenstein, for appellant.

J. B. McGregor, for appellee.


This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment on a note, which was attached to the complaint, drawn under the Georgia Industrial Loan Act. It contained an acceleration clause in the event of default by the debtor for the acceleration of all remaining instalments, including earned and unearned interest. Reversal is required under our holdings in Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co., 131 Ga. App. 96 ( 205 S.E.2d 110), aff'd., 232 Ga. 637, and Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., 131 Ga. App. 282 ( 205 S.E.2d 526), aff'd., 232 Ga. 632. It makes no difference that the suit in this case was brought with an allowance for unearned interest. The controlling factor is that the plaintiff contracted for the collection of unearned interest which violates the Industrial Loan Act and voids the obligation. Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co., supra, and Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., supra. Accordingly, as violation appears on the face of the record, it was error to deny the motion to set aside.

Judgment reversed. Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.


ARGUED MAY 6, 1975 — DECIDED JUNE 10, 1975.


Summaries of

Guyton v. Martin Finance Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 10, 1975
217 S.E.2d 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Guyton v. Martin Finance Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GUYTON v. MARTIN FINANCE CORPORATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 10, 1975

Citations

217 S.E.2d 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
217 S.E.2d 390

Citing Cases

Blazer Financial Services, Inc. v. Dukes

We find this language to be consistent and synonymous with acceleration clauses construed by this court and…