From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guy v. Corizon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 27, 2013
CV 12-0774 JCH/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CV 12-0774 JCH/WPL

03-27-2013

RICHARD GENE GUY, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, INC., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (PFRD), filed March 5, 2013. (Doc. 21) The parties were notified that objections were due within fourteen days of service of the PFRD and that if no objections were filed, no appellate review would be allowed. To this date, no objections have been filed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) the PFRD is adopted as an order of the Court;

2) the Court construes Plaintiff's purported "Response to Defendant Corizon Inc.['s] Answer to Writ of Habeas Corpus" (Doc. 20) as an amended complaint; and

3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Department of Corrections and the GEO Group are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Guy v. Corizon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 27, 2013
CV 12-0774 JCH/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Guy v. Corizon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD GENE GUY, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON, INC., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

CV 12-0774 JCH/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 27, 2013)