From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1961
12 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

February 23, 1961


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents. We agree with the findings of the trial court to the effect that there was no diversion of funds on the part of defendants, and that plaintiff had full knowledge of and consented to all of the acts of which he now complains. In the circumstances the plaintiff may not recover whether it be in an action at law or in equity for an accounting. The findings of the arbitrators were not binding upon the court because the arbitrators did not pass upon the relationship between the partners and the corporation for the period encompassed by the court's decision. In view of the above we need not pass on any of the other issues raised.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Valente, McNally, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1961
12 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Gutwirth v. Carewell Trading Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GUTWIRTH, Appellant, v. CAREWELL TRADING CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1961

Citations

12 A.D.2d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
211 N.Y.S.2d 732

Citing Cases

NCAS Realty Management Corp. v. National Corp. for Housing Partnerships

With respect to transactions pre-dating the March 2 letter, plaintiff raises two defenses as to why those…