From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 12, 2018
NUMBER 13-17-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2018)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-17-00226-CR

01-12-2018

MARTIN VAZQUEZ GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On Appeal from the 22nd District Court of Hays County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez, and Justices Contreras and Benavides
Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Martin Vazquez Gutierrez, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number CR-16-0239. The trial court's certification of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 C.S.).

On August 31, 2017, we ordered appellant's counsel, Gary E. Prust, to, within thirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. Counsel requested an extension of time to file a response which was granted by this Court until December 20, 2017.

No response to this Court's order has been received. Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for a hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order. The trial court's findings and conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in this matter, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 12th day of January, 2018.


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jan 12, 2018
NUMBER 13-17-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN VAZQUEZ GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jan 12, 2018

Citations

NUMBER 13-17-00226-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 12, 2018)