From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Rockefeller Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2003
307 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-08258

Submitted June 11, 2003.

July 28, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated January 9, 2002, which denied their motion for leave to renew and reargue the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which was granted in a prior order of the same court dated June 26, 2001.

Ioannou Associates (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac De Cicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for appellants.

Tarshis Hammerman, LLP, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Roberta E. Tarshis of counsel; Elysa B. Wolfe on the brief), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appellants' motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue the defendants' prior motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time they opposed the original motion. Therefore, the motion was, in fact, one for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Pierre v. Delish Bakery Rest., 294 A.D.2d 417, 418).

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Rockefeller Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2003
307 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Rockefeller Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TERESA GUTIERREZ, ET AL., appellants, v. ROCKEFELLER GROUP, INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 28, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

Mount Sinai Hosp v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.

In addition, the appellant neither submitted new facts not offered on the prior motion, nor demonstrated a…