From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2015
CASE NO. 3:11 CV 01707 (N.D. Ohio May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11 CV 01707

05-12-2015

FELIPE GUTIERREZ, JR., Petitioner, v. RHONDA RICHARD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the petitioner's timely objections to the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss, in part, and deny, in part, the petitioner's petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

This Court has considered de novo those portions of the R&R to which the petitioner objects, pursuant to Local Rule 72.3(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Finding the objections to be without merit and the R&R to be without error, the Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. The Report and Recommendation is accordingly adopted in its entirety, and the petitioner's petition is dismissed in part and denied in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Lesley Wells

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: 12 May 2015


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Richard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2015
CASE NO. 3:11 CV 01707 (N.D. Ohio May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Richard

Case Details

Full title:FELIPE GUTIERREZ, JR., Petitioner, v. RHONDA RICHARD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11 CV 01707 (N.D. Ohio May. 12, 2015)