From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gutierrez v. Palmateer

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 18, 2007
Civil No. 03-309-TC (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 03-309-TC.

April 18, 2007


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin filed Findings and Recommendation on February 8, 2007, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Petitioner has timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.

I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed February 8, 2007, in its entirety. Petitioner's petition (#2) is denied. This proceeding is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gutierrez v. Palmateer

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 18, 2007
Civil No. 03-309-TC (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Gutierrez v. Palmateer

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO A. GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, v. JOAN PALMATEER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 18, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 03-309-TC (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2007)