Opinion
No. 13-72979
08-02-2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Agency No. A205-578-246 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Jesus Manuel Gutierrez-Neyoy, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision pretermitting his applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Leal v. Holder, 771 F.3d 1140, 1144 (9th Cir. 2014), and deny the petition for review.
Gutierrez-Neyoy's contention that his conviction for felony endangerment under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1201(A) is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude is foreclosed by our decision in Leal v. Holder. Id. at 1146 (felony endangerment in Arizona is a crime involving moral turpitude). Accordingly, the BIA did not err in determining that Gutierrez-Neyoy is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(3), 1229b(b)(1)(B), 1229c(b)(1)(B).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.