From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guthrie v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 17, 1972
212 Va. 550 (Va. 1972)

Opinion

42626 Record No. 7719.

January 17, 1972

Present, All the Justices.

Criminal Procedure — Guilty Plea — Knowledge of Charge.

Defendant pleaded guilty after full knowledge that prosecution was being conducted under Code provision providing maximum penalty of 20 years for wounding guard while escaping. Form of indictment may not be challenged on appeal since it was sufficient to charge offense of escape.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Hanover County. Hon. Edward P. Simpkins, Jr., judge presiding.

Affirmed.

Robert P. Beaver, for plaintiff in error.

Burnett Miller, III, Assistant Attorney General (Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General, on brief), for defendant in error.


Clarence Guthrie, the defendant, entered a plea of guilty to an indictment charging that he did ". . . unlawfully and feloniously escape from the custody of officers while being confined for a conviction of a felony." The trial court sentenced him to confinement for a term of ten years in the state penitentiary.

Guthrie alleges that the trial court erred in ". . . imposing a greater sentence than the penalty called for in the indictment."

Prior to Guthrie's arraignment and plea, in response to an inquiry by defense counsel, the Commonwealth's Attorney mistakenly indicated that he was proceeding against the defendant under Code Sec. 18.1-288. Guthrie argues that this was an election by the Commonwealth which limited his punishment to the maximum of five years provided by that statute.

This claim is without merit as the record establishes that Guthrie, prior to his plea, was advised by both his counsel and the trial court that the prosecution was being conducted under Code Sec. 53-291. Guthrie was also advised that he, as an inmate of a penal institution, was subject to a maximum penalty of twenty years imprisonment if he had inflicted bodily injury on the guard from whose custody he escaped, a fact that was later established by uncontraverted evidence.

The form of the indictment was not challenged prior to verdict and it may not be challenged now since it is sufficient to charge an offense. McDougal v. Commonwealth, 212 Va. 547, 186 S.E.2d 18 (1972), this day decided.

The record shows that Guthrie's plea of guilty was voluntarily and intelligently tendered by him and was accepted by the trial court.

Such a plea is, in reality, a self supplied conviction authorizing imposition of the punishment fixed by law. It is a waiver of all defenses other than those jurisdictional, effective as such not only in the lower court but as well in this court. When a conviction is rendered upon such a plea and the punishment fixed by law is in fact imposed in a proceeding free of jurisdictional defect, there is nothing to appeal. Peyton v. King 210 Va. 194, 169 S.E.2d 569 (1969).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Guthrie v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Jan 17, 1972
212 Va. 550 (Va. 1972)
Case details for

Guthrie v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE GUTHRIE v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Jan 17, 1972

Citations

212 Va. 550 (Va. 1972)
186 S.E.2d 26

Citing Cases

Wolfe v. Commonwealth

Additionally, this Court has consistently and repeatedly held that generally a defendant must challenge the…

Miles v. Sheriff of the Virginia Beach City Jail

Miles posits that the court could not "presume a priori and in the absence of any evidence" that he did not…