From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guth v. South Whitehall Township Civil Service Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 3, 1985
500 A.2d 1241 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1985)

Opinion

July 3, 1985.

Civil service — Timeliness of appeal — First Class Township Code, Act of June 24, 1931, P.L. 1206 — Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5571 — Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202 — Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C. S. § 1971.

1. Provisions of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5571, establish a uniform appeal time with certain exceptions and repeal conflicting provisions of the First Class Township Code, Act of June 24, 1931, P.L. 1206, relating to appeals from civil service commissions, and conflicting provisions of the latter statute do not remain in effect merely because reference is made to them in civil service commission rules as such are repealed by provisions of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act, Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, and of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C. S. § 1971. [234-5]

Submitted on briefs June 6, 1985, to Judges ROGERS, BARRY and PALLADINO, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 1793 C.D. 1984, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County in case of Dennis Guth v. South Whitehall Township Civil Service Commission, No. 83-C-3020.

Township police officer suspended by township police chief. Officer appealed to the Civil Service Commission of South Whitehall Township. Suspension upheld. Officer appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County. Commission filed motion to quash appeal as untimely. Motion granted. MELLENBERG, J. Officer appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

Aaron M. Matte, for appellant.

Jack I. Kaufman, for appellee.


Dennis Guth, a township police officer, has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County granting a motion to quash as untimely filed his appeal from an order of the township Civil Service Commission (commission).

The township chief of police suspended the appellant for three days without pay for conduct unbecoming a police officer, and the commission after hearing upheld the police chief's action. The commission's order was entered on August 17, 1983. The appellant filed his appeal to the court of common pleas on October 14, 1983, the fifty-seventh day after the commission's order was entered. The court of common pleas, as mentioned, granted the commission's motion to quash the appeal.

The appellant says his appeal was timely filed pursuant to Section 1108 of the commission's Rules and Regulations which provides as follows:

Section 1108. Appeal In the event the Commission sustains the charges and orders the suspension, removal or reduction in rank, the person so suspended, removed or reduced in rank shall have immediate right of appeal to the Court of Common Pleas in Lehigh County, such appeal to be taken by petition to said Court within sixty (60) days from the date of entry by the Commission of its final order. . . .

Section 645 of the applicable First Class Township Code, Act of June 24, 1931, P.L. 1206, as amended, 53 P. S. § 55645, provides:

In the event the commission shall sustain the charges and order the suspension, removal or reduction in rank, the person suspended, removed or reduced in rank shall have immediate right of appeal to the court of common pleas of the county. . . . Such appeal shall be taken within sixty days from the date of entry by the Commission of its final order and shall be by petition.

The common pleas court however held that the applicable statute was Section 5571(b) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5571(b). We agree. Section 5571(b) provides:

Other Courts — Except as otherwise provided in subsection (a) and (c), an appeal from a tribunal or other government unit to a court or from a court to an appellate court must be commenced within 30 days after the entry of the order from which the appeal is taken. . . .

Section 20002(g) of the Judiciary Act Repealer Act (JARA), 42 Pa. P. S. § 20002(g), states:

All other parts of those acts which are specified in this section and all other acts and parts of acts are hereby repealed insofar as they are in any manner inconsistent with this act or the act to which this is a supplement. (Emphasis supplied.)

The material facts of this case are quite similar to those of Crown v. Township of Ross, 68 Pa. Commw. 588, 449 A.2d 878 (1982), where we held that Section 5571(b) of the Judicial Code created a uniform thirty day appeal period for all cases except election, probate and execution cases and that it repealed Section 645 of the First Class Township Code. The appellant, however, contends that the sixty day appeal period nevertheless survives because it is incorporated into the commission's rules by Section 1108 of those rules. This contention fails not only because Section 20002(g) of JARA, 42 Pa. P. S. § 20002(g), expressly repeals all inconsistent enactments but also because Section 1971(b) of the Statutory Construction Act, 1 Pa. C. S. § 1971(b), requires that:

Whenever a general statute purports to establish a uniform and mandatory system covering a class of subjects, such statute shall be construed to supply and therefore to repeal preexisting local or special statutes on the same class of subjects.

Section 5571(b) of the Judicial Code is obviously part of a general statute establishing a uniform and mandatory system covering the proceedings of courts and governmental bodies.

Order affirmed.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 1985, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.


Summaries of

Guth v. South Whitehall Township Civil Service Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 3, 1985
500 A.2d 1241 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1985)
Case details for

Guth v. South Whitehall Township Civil Service Commission

Case Details

Full title:Dennis Guth, Appellant v. South Whitehall Township Civil Service…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 3, 1985

Citations

500 A.2d 1241 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1985)
500 A.2d 1241

Citing Cases

Scott v. Bristol Tp. Police Dept

Although the 60-day provision of Section 645 has not been deleted, this Court has held that Section 5571(b)…