From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gustard v. McCauley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 27, 2022
2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PS)

11-27-2022

CHRISTOPHER IAN GUSTARD, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. McCAULEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER ECF NO. 119

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was before the court on November 10, 2022, for a status conference. ECF No. 122. Deputy Attorney General Andrew Steinheimer appeared on behalf of defendants; plaintiff appeared pro se. For the reasons discussed on the record, the court grants in part plaintiff's motion for an extension of time for the limited purpose of allowing plaintiff to file a motion to compel.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 119, is granted in part.

2. Plaintiff shall file a motion to compel on or before November 30, 2022.

3. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is extended to April 5, 2023.

4. Absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions of time will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gustard v. McCauley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 27, 2022
2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Gustard v. McCauley

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER IAN GUSTARD, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. McCAULEY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 27, 2022

Citations

2:17-cv-00012-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2022)