From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gustafson v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 30, 2012
3:11-cv-00814-RCJ (WGC) (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00814-RCJ (WGC)

04-30-2012

HAROLD A. GUSTAFSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES COX, et. al, Defendants.


ORDER

Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Order Directing Defendants to Keep Plaintiff in the Jurisdiction of the Court at the Northern Nevada Correctional Center. (Doc. # 9.) Plaintiff asks that he be ordered to remain at Northern Nevada Correctional Center because it is located in Carson City, Nevada, in close proximity to the Attorney General's Office, and would facilitate efficiency in the management of this action. (Id.)

The Supreme Court has determined that prisoners do not have a right to stay at a particular institution. See Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 225-27 (1976). The court will not interject itself into the minutia of prison administration. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

WILLIAM G. COBB

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gustafson v. Cox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 30, 2012
3:11-cv-00814-RCJ (WGC) (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Gustafson v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD A. GUSTAFSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES COX, et. al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00814-RCJ (WGC) (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2012)