From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gursten v. Doe

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 5, 2022
SC 162934 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

SC 162934 (51) COA 352225

01-05-2022

STEVEN M. GURSTEN and MICHIGAN AUTO LAW, PC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN DOE 1, a/k/a, TOM MAHLER, JOHN DOE 3, a/k/a MARCELLUS FRANCIS and VICTOR LANDON, SR., JOHN DOE 4, a/k/a VEGAN4 LIFE and ARIELLE HIPPIE GIRL, and JOHN DOE 5, a/k/a STOP EATING ANIMALS, Defendants, and JOHN DOE 2, a/k/a PATRICK ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellee.


Oakland CC: 2019-171503-NO

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice, Brian K. Zahra, David F. Viviano, Richard H. Bernstein, Elizabeth T. Clement, Megan K. Cavanagh, Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion to file supplemental brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Gursten v. Doe

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jan 5, 2022
SC 162934 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Gursten v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN M. GURSTEN and MICHIGAN AUTO LAW, PC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

SC 162934 (Mich. Jan. 5, 2022)