Gupta v. Cate

Full title: RAJ CHRISTOPHER GUPTA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

2:12-cv-1693 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

RAJ CHRISTOPHER GUPTA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-1693 GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 17, 2012

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.