Gupta v. Alameida

Full title: RAJ CHRISTOPHER GUPTA, Petitioner, v. EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 24, 2005

2:02-cv-1421-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2005)

Opinion

2:02-cv-1421-GEB-JFM-P.

October 24, 2005

ORDER

GARLAND BURRELL Jr., District Judge

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 13, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.