From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gunter v. Drexel Univ.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 5, 2024
2:23-cv-02451-JDW (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-02451-JDW

11-05-2024

KIM GUNTER, Plaintiff, v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, Defendant.


ORDER

JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2024, upon consideration of the Motion For Summary Judgment Of Defendant, Drexel University (ECF Nos. 73, 74, 80), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Ms. Gunter's claims of: (a) disparate treatment (Counts II & V) and (b) retaliation (Counts III & IV); and

2. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Ms. Gunter's hostile work environment claims (Counts I & VI), consistent with the analysis set forth in my Memorandum.


Summaries of

Gunter v. Drexel Univ.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 5, 2024
2:23-cv-02451-JDW (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Gunter v. Drexel Univ.

Case Details

Full title:KIM GUNTER, Plaintiff, v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 5, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-02451-JDW (E.D. Pa. Nov. 5, 2024)